<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coq au Vin Recipe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reluctantgourmet.com/blog/chicken-recipes/coq-au-vin-recipe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reluctantgourmet.com/blog/chicken-recipes/coq-au-vin-recipe/</link>
	<description>You Have To Eat, So Learn To Cook &#38; Eat Well</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RG</title>
		<link>http://www.reluctantgourmet.com/blog/chicken-recipes/coq-au-vin-recipe/comment-page-1/#comment-82925</link>
		<dc:creator>RG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reluctantgourmet.com/blog/?p=536#comment-82925</guid>
		<description>Good points, especially how a "recipe is like a snapshot...of one moment in time".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, especially how a &#8220;recipe is like a snapshot&#8230;of one moment in time&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenni</title>
		<link>http://www.reluctantgourmet.com/blog/chicken-recipes/coq-au-vin-recipe/comment-page-1/#comment-69281</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reluctantgourmet.com/blog/?p=536#comment-69281</guid>
		<description>I think this debate is a debate of semantics.  Recipe versus technique.  There is no doubt in my mind that folks have been tenderizing tough birds in wine for hundreds of years.

Culinary history is very murky, at best, and I really think it might be good for the "sport" and less intimidating for novices if we all just relaxed a little.

A recipe is like a snapshot--a portrait of one moment in time.  Just as the girl in the picture existed before the picture was taken and will continue to live afterwards, surely dishes have been made to one standard or another both before and after the publishing of a particular recipe--one cook's way of doing something on that particular day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this debate is a debate of semantics.  Recipe versus technique.  There is no doubt in my mind that folks have been tenderizing tough birds in wine for hundreds of years.</p>
<p>Culinary history is very murky, at best, and I really think it might be good for the &#8220;sport&#8221; and less intimidating for novices if we all just relaxed a little.</p>
<p>A recipe is like a snapshot&#8211;a portrait of one moment in time.  Just as the girl in the picture existed before the picture was taken and will continue to live afterwards, surely dishes have been made to one standard or another both before and after the publishing of a particular recipe&#8211;one cook&#8217;s way of doing something on that particular day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RG</title>
		<link>http://www.reluctantgourmet.com/blog/chicken-recipes/coq-au-vin-recipe/comment-page-1/#comment-69269</link>
		<dc:creator>RG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reluctantgourmet.com/blog/?p=536#comment-69269</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter, I read your article on coq au vin and found it very interesting and very informative. Thank you for bringing it to my attention however I'm still a little confused as why you don't think the dish was around more than 100 years. You bring up a good point though, is a recipe officially a "recipe" only after it is published in a cookbook? For example, if farmers were stewing their old roosters in wine for hundreds of years, is it only Coq au Vin after it is published?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter, I read your article on coq au vin and found it very interesting and very informative. Thank you for bringing it to my attention however I&#8217;m still a little confused as why you don&#8217;t think the dish was around more than 100 years. You bring up a good point though, is a recipe officially a &#8220;recipe&#8221; only after it is published in a cookbook? For example, if farmers were stewing their old roosters in wine for hundreds of years, is it only Coq au Vin after it is published?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hertzmann</title>
		<link>http://www.reluctantgourmet.com/blog/chicken-recipes/coq-au-vin-recipe/comment-page-1/#comment-68866</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hertzmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reluctantgourmet.com/blog/?p=536#comment-68866</guid>
		<description>RG: you need to dig a little deeper in coq au vin history. The dish is less than 100 years old and was not originally prepared with a rooster or old hen. That interpretation probably came about from a cook not knowing the origins. The name was just meant to be colorful. See http://xrl.us/bedtc9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RG: you need to dig a little deeper in coq au vin history. The dish is less than 100 years old and was not originally prepared with a rooster or old hen. That interpretation probably came about from a cook not knowing the origins. The name was just meant to be colorful. See <a href="http://xrl.us/bedtc9" rel="nofollow">http://xrl.us/bedtc9</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
